Table of contents of the article:
The myth of the “American cloud”
In Italy we have a characteristic all our own: we adore America.
From XXL burgers to iPhone Pro Max to the cloud AWS, Google Cloud, Azure and the plans WordPress VIP Enterprise from $24.000 a year (yes, twenty-four thousand).
The problem? We're not in America.
Yet, every day, we see companies that do tough economic choices for fashion, for status or, more simply, by hearsay:
“I read that the big companies are using AWS, so we should go there too.”
The reasoning makes sense… until the first five-figure invoices arrive.
Often the story always begins the same way: with an incentive.
You'll receive an unmissable offer:
-
A full year of free AWS credits ;
-
A nice welcome bonus from Google Cloud ;
-
A shiny demo of WordPress VIP Enterprise , “to get your project off the ground.”
And there you feel on cloud nine.
You think: “Well, if the big players are using these services, then it must be the right way. Let's do it!”
The first few months go smoothly: everything runs smoothly, costs are zero, and you almost feel part of that technological elite that "plays in the digital Serie A."
Then, however, comes the thirteenth month.
Credits run out. Discounts disappear. Marketing stops smiling at you.
E reality begins.
The first bill hits you like a punch in the stomach :
-
Aurora DB on AWS : $7.000 per month , database only.
-
CDN, Load Balancer, and EC2 instances : another $3.000 per month.
-
“Priority” support : $2.500 , which is actually their priority, not yours.
-
WordPress VIP : $24.000 per year , enough to handle 30-40 million monthly pageviews.
At this point, you sit down, take a deep breath, and start doing some math.
Because an annoying thought is ringing in your head:
“Wait a minute… what the hell am I paying for exactly?”
And when you remember what you're hosting on that galactic infrastructure , the scene becomes almost comical:
-
A Magento that manages a catalog of a few thousand products.
-
A WordPress with a few thousand visits a day.
-
A WooCommerce that sells in Italy and makes 100 orders a day , when things go well.
And that's when you realize the truth: you bought a Boeing 747 to fly around the block.
Welcome to the club of “You want to act American but you were born in Italy”.
It's the exclusive club of those who thought they'd made a visionary investment, but now find themselves with bills that look like the GDP of a small municipality.
The paradox of Italian companies: spending on fashion and hearsay
There's a problem we see recurring every day, almost as if it were a written rule: many Italian companies believe that buying "American" automatically means buying the best . It's a bit like thinking that if you only drink Coca-Cola you'll suddenly become cooler: in reality, you're just paying more for something you may not need.
The allure of "Made in USA" is immense, and the marketing of hyperscalers like AWS, Google Cloud, Azure , or the $24.000-a-year WordPress VIP Enterprise plans works brilliantly. They tell us stories of powerful infrastructure, infinite scalability, and services "designed for the future." And the entrepreneur's mind starts wandering: "If the big guys use these services, then I have to use them too. Otherwise, I'll be left behind . "
The reality, however, is that these services are designed for a completely different market than ours . They were created for companies that manage global social networks , platforms with millions of concurrent active users , or applications distributed across five continents . If your business truly has that level of complexity, then yes, AWS and similar services can make sense.
But in the vast majority of cases, it is not so.
If you sell handcrafted bags in Italy, if you have a WooCommerce making 500 orders a day, if your goal is to serve Italian or at most European customersthen Set up a 15-node Kubernetes cluster hosted on AWS it is not only useless… And harmful.
Why?
For at least three reasons, which those who make these choices often underestimate:
-
You complicate your life with disproportionate management
AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure aren't designed to be simple. They're environments designed for dedicated DevOps teams, with people who do just that all day. Each service is highly configurable, but also potentially complex to manageIf you have a small technical team, you risk spending more time figuring out how to make the platform work than working on your product. -
You pay ten times as much for resources you don't use.
Companies often purchase plans that are too large for their actual needs. And here, American marketing wins: they convince you that you need to be "ready to scale," that you need to "anticipate growth." The result? Pages of monthly invoices from thousands of euros, when in reality your site could work just fine with a dedicated and optimized infrastructure, a tenth of the cost. -
You depend on a supplier who doesn't speak your language
And here we are not just talking about literal language, but about mentality, market, approachA US cloud service thinks in dollars, reasons in huge volumes, works with margins that make sense in a country where average salaries in the IT sector are three times higher than oursWhen you get a $7.000 bill for an Aurora database, they think it's normal: because in their market it isIn our country, however, that expense can become unsustainable after just a few months.
The result of this pursuit of “fashion” is that too many Italian companies find themselves in a trap : they have invested thousands of euros in oversized solutions, but have not improved performance, have not increased their customer base, and find themselves with an out-of-control bill.
The truth is, we're not American companies . We don't have the same market, we don't have the same financial resources, and above all, we don't need the same tools . Sometimes, spending less doesn't mean settling , but choosing wisely.
In America, everything is bigger. Even the bills.
There is a concept that seems to escape many Italian entrepreneurs: in America everything costs more because everything is bigger.
Let's take a Coca-Cola bottle : here you can find 1,5 liters , or two at most if you're stocking up for a barbecue. There, however, it starts at 3 liters . It's so big you need two hands to pour it, and if you're alone, you might want to practice with a few sets of squats first.
Then there are the donuts . Here in Italy, you buy one at the bar and hold it with two fingers. In the United States, however, some donuts are so huge they look like the tire of a Panda . You need cutlery, a tray, and probably a friend to finish them.
And what about skyscrapers ? Here we're used to six-story buildings, eight at best. There are entire vertical neighborhoods there : dozens and dozens of towers, one next to the other, so tall you have to tilt your head back to see the top.
And then… there are the people . Well, it's best to skip that . Let's just say that, when everything is bigger, they tend to be bigger too.
And of course, as you may have already understood, the salaries are also bigger.
A systems engineer, a DevOps or a cloud architect in the USA earns on average three times as much compared to an Italian professional with the same experience. And not because he is "better": simply the market is different, the purchasing power is different, and above all the cost of living is a completely different planet.
And this is a fundamental point: if in America everything costs more, including salaries, it's normal that cloud services and infrastructure are dearer.
The problem arises when we Italians we fall in love with those same solutions designed for that market, without considering that we play in a different league.
Let's take a concrete example.
| Role | Italy (average RAL) | USA (average RAL) |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Linux System Administrator | ~ €38.000 | ~ $ 135.000 |
| DevOps Engineer | ~ €45.000 | ~ $ 150.000 |
| Cloud Architect | ~ €60.000 | ~ $ 180.000 |
Yet, many Italians are surprised by the US cloud service costs.
Spoiler: the price is related to local salaries.
When you pay $7.000 a month for an Aurora database on AWS, they're not ripping you off : to them, that cost makes sense in a market where an entry-level developer earns $90.000 a year . And when we write $7000 a month, that's not just a figure of speech:
“But everything is better there!” (spoiler: no)
How many times do we hear it said:
“Eh, but Amazon is Amazon.”
“Google is Google.”
“Microsoft Azure is the future.”
Yes, of course. No one doubts that Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have built incredible infrastructures . They are global giants, and it's true: their services work well in the United States. But there's a small detail that's often overlooked: their target customers aren't you.
In America, those who use WordPress VIP at $24.000 a year aren't doing so to host a corporate blog with 40.000 monthly visits. That plan is designed for gigantic publishing portals , generating tens of billions of page views per month , with in-house technical teams managing every detail, six-figure annual budgets, and complex infrastructures serving users spread across the globe.
In that context, it makes sense.
The problem is that we are not in America.
Here in Italy, the reality is different: your site, perhaps, does 40 – 50 million page views per month — which are already significant numbers — but you're not talking about 500 million visitors spread across three continentsYou don't have a 20-person DevOps team, you don't have five dedicated data centers, and most importantly you don't have the same budget.
We've hosted numbers like that, with around 85 million page views on servers costing a few hundred euros.
Yet, we often see companies embarking on these very expensive adventures:
-
WordPress VIP plans from $24.000 per year ;
-
Aurora Database from $7.000 per month ;
-
Load balancers, CDNs, and EC2 instances that drain you $3.000 a month ;
-
“Priority” support that costs more than rent in central Milan.
Do you know what the most paradoxical thing is?
We can easily achieve the same numbers, if not better, with a €300 per month car.
Yes, you read that right: 300 € per month.
An optimized server, next-generation NVMe storage, intelligent caching, fine-tuning of MySQL/MariaDB and PHP-FPM, and We serve those 40 million monthly page views without any problems.
The difference?
-
No lock-in , you can change supplier whenever you want.
-
Real performance , because the server is configured to your needs, not to the needs of an American customer with 500 million users.
-
Support in Italian , from people who really care about you, without open tickets for days.
-
A sustainable cost , which doesn't drain your marketing budget, doesn't force you to cut staff and leaves you room to grow your business.
So yes, Amazon is Amazon, Google is Google, and Azure is Azure.
But don't be fooled: you pay for the brand, not the actual value.
It's not that their services don't work, on the contrary: they work fine… But for their market.
The point is that in Italy, very often, that same infrastructure is a Lamborghini for going shopping.
The result? Huge bills for doing what a well-optimized dedicated server lets you do with a tenth of the budget.
The truth is, the problem isn't Amazon . The problem is choosing Amazon without knowing why.
Europe ≠ USA (and not even Europe = Europe)
One of the most common mistakes when talking about digital services, cloud and IT infrastructures is to think that Europe should all be the same.
We're in the European Union, we have a single currency, we like to believe that the economic dynamics are the same... but that's not the case.
In reality, there is a huge gulf between a German and an Italian systems engineer , and not only in terms of salary, but above all in terms of purchasing power.
| Country | RAL Media Senior Systems Engineer | Purchasing power |
|---|---|---|
| Germany 🇩🇪 | ~ €70.000 | High |
| France 🇫🇷 | ~ €55.000 | Medium-High |
| Italy 🇮🇹 | ~ €38.000 | Medium low |
| Greece 🇬🇷 | ~ €25.000 | Low |
| Romania 🇷🇴 | ~ €20.000 | Very low |
And here's the point: if a cloud service costs €2.000 per month, for a German company it could be a completely sustainable cost, almost negligible compared to their average turnover and profit margins.
For a French company, perhaps it requires a little more thought, but it remains a viable option.
For an Italian company, however, €2.000 per month for infrastructure is often a burden, a cost that risks becoming unsustainable within a few months.
Not to mention Greece, Romania, or other Eastern European countries, where average salaries are even lower: €2.000 a month is a luxury for a few.
This means that we can't just copy what others do.
We can't look at a Berlin company that pays its developers €80.000 per year, and think about replicating the same IT strategy with a team that earns half or a third of the money.
We cannot compare ourselves to French budgets or the American model and delude ourselves that “if it works for them, it will work for us too.”
It's a mistake of perspective.
Italy has a different market, different margins, different customers and a business fabric made up largely of SMEs who cannot afford the excessive costs of solutions designed for multinational giants.
The solution?
Open your eyes and stop copying models that they don't work in our economic context.
Instead of chasing the idea that “if we spend more we will have the best”, we must learn to do choices proportionate to our reality: European solutions, European prices, European support.
Better yet, when possible, Italian services: same results, optimised costs and a direct relationship with those who manage your infrastructure.
The myth of exclusivity
There's an idea we often see among entrepreneurs and managers:
“If I pay more, it means I get something better.”
A reasoning that can work when you choose a luxury car or Swiss watch, but that in the IT world it almost never makes sense.
In fact, it's often just the opposite.
In the technology sector, especially with the large American hyperscalers, price is not a measure of quality, but rather of the infrastructure complexity that they are selling to you.
And here comes the point: that complexity you do not need it.
Take AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure.
These platforms are designed for global scenarios, for companies that manage millions of users in real time, who have DevOps teams of dozens of people and six-figure budgets just for infrastructure.
The problem is that then those same oversized infrastructures they are “packaged” and resold to anyone, including the small Italian company that makes 100 orders per day on its e-commerce.
The result?
You pay for features you'll never use.
You find yourself managing control panels full of options you don't need.
And, in the end, you spend five or ten times more than what would actually be necessary for your project.
The truth is that you don't need to buy a Boeing to go around the block.
there European alternatives, designed for the needs of companies like yours, offering:
-
Managed hosting with equivalent or even better performance.
-
Technical support plans included , with people who actually look after you.
-
No lock-in : You are free to move your project whenever and wherever you want, without hidden constraints.
-
Costs up to 10 times lower than US platforms.
And we're not talking about "reduced" solutions or improvised services.
We are talking about optimised infrastructures, custom-configured, with truly dedicated resources and latest generation technologies.
The problem is that many companies fall for the marketing hype : famous logos, shiny dashboards, buzzwords like “cloud-native,” “serverless,” and “machine learning.” It all sounds great on paper, but then you discover you’re paying a huge premium for features your business will never use.
If your site does 40 million page views per month, you don't need a WordPress VIP plan to $24.000 a year.
With a dedicated server optimized, which costs €300-400 per month, get the same performances and, in many cases, better results.
So no: paying more doesn't mean getting more.
It means, very often, paying for unnecessary complexity and because of the weight of a brand that thrives on customers who don't share your market, your needs, and, above all, your budget.
The key is not to spend a lot, but to spend well.
"Repatriation": Bringing Data Home
In recent years there is a word that is becoming increasingly important in the IT world: repatriation.
Literally it means “bring home”.
In practice, it means move their data, applications and infrastructure from American hyperscalers to more sustainable European solutions.
Why are more and more companies making this choice?
Because after the initial excitement, after the free credits, the captivating demos and the shiny dashboards, comes the moment of truth: the invoices.
And they never lie.
Find out what you're paying for 7.000 dollars a month for an Aurora database only, dollars 3.000 for load balancers and CDNs, and 24.000 dollars a year for a WordPress VIP plan that doesn't even utilize 30% of its potential.
At that point, you start to ask yourself: “But is all this really necessary?”
The answer, almost always, is No..
And the repatriation it's the way out.
Bringing data and infrastructure “home” means regain control.
It means relying on solutions europee, designed for our market, with proportionate prices to the purchasing power of our companies and truly optimized services for our needs.
The advantages are concrete:
-
Cost reduction up to 90%
In many cases, what you pay today 3.000 € per month on AWS, on an optimized European infrastructure it costs you 300 €Not because the quality is inferior, but because the solution is proportionate to your needs. -
Better performance
A custom-configured infrastructure, optimized for your stack (WordPress, WooCommerce, Magento, etc.), with advanced caching, NVMe storage, and targeted tuning. often outperforms a standard setup on a hyperscaler. -
Legal security and GDPR
With repatriation, the data remains in Europe and are managed in full compliance with the GDPR. This not only reduces compliance risks, but also puts you protected from legal problems related to American data processing laws (such as the CloudAct). -
Support in Italian, from real people
No more anonymous tickets ending up in a team on the other side of the world. Here you talk to who knows your project, your market, and your needs. Get answers, not FAQs.
And there is a fundamental point to understand: it's not just a question of savings.
Repatriation is not just about cutting costs, it's about take back control of your business.
We deal with economic sustainability and technological independence.
Why is it useless to have an infrastructure 10.000 € per month if, after a year, you find yourself having to turn it off because you can no longer afford the costs.
On the contrary, choosing a more balanced European infrastructure allows you to invest in marketing, product development and real growth of your company, instead of burning budget on services you don't need.
In other words, the repatriation it's not a step backwards.
It's a step forward.
It means choose consciously where to keep your data, how much to spend e what performances to achieve.
Because, in the end, Having an efficient infrastructure does not mean having a huge infrastructure.
It means to have the right one for your business.
Conclusion: Let's wake up
If, while reading these lines, you have found yourself in at least one of the scenarios described, then perhaps the time has come to stop and reflect for a moment.
Ask yourself honestly:
-
Are you paying a $24.000 per year WordPress VIP plan to do exactly the same things a good Italian hosting provider could offer you for €1.000 per month … if not less?
-
Are you spending $7.000 a month just on Aurora databases on AWS to run an e-commerce business that sells in Italy and that, in reality, could run perfectly on an optimized dedicated server costing €300 a month?
-
Have you been captivated by the brand , thinking “if the big players use it then I should too”, without even considering European and Italian alternatives that are more suited to your business?
If the answer is “yes” to even one of these questions, then the problem is not the technology , but the strategy.
The truth is that in most cases you don't need an American hyperscaler.
What you really need is a sustainable IT strategy, built on your real needs, scalable when needed, but proportionate to your numbers and your market.
And you know what the good news is?
Going back is possible.
The so-called cloud repatriation it's not an extreme operation: we do it everyday.
We move projects from AWS, Google Cloud, Azure and WordPress VIP to optimized infrastructures in Europe and Italy, without downtime, without negative impacts and, above all, with immediate benefits:
-
Significant savings — sometimes up to 90% of costs.
-
Superior performance , thanks to custom-designed infrastructures.
-
More transparent management , with direct access to those who actually take care of your project.
-
Real support , in Italian, with people who speak your language and understand your business.
In other words: it's not about going back.
It is take a step forward, towards a smarter, more sustainable model that is closer to the needs of Italian and European companies.
So, before you get seduced by the shiny marketing, the shiny demos and the opening credits that seem to give you the moon, stop for a moment and think:
“Do I really need all this? Or am I just paying for a brand?”
Because the truth is simple:
you don't need to spend 10 times more to get the same performance.
Serve choose with awareness.
And always remember one thing, which is more true today than ever:
“You want to act American… but you were born in Italy.”
And there's nothing wrong with acting accordingly.
In fact, it's probably the best choice you can make for the future of your company.






